Is the HUSD administration making a bad situation worse?
A few days ago the EV Tribune ran a rather scathing editorial about the way the HUSD administration is currently handling this fiasco with using public money to conduct a poll about an election issue. The rule is that once an issue is officially on a ballot no public money may be used to research it. See here for more details on that.
Anyway, it now sounds like the administration is considering stiffing the firm they hired to conduct the survey. Here are some excerpts from that editorial:
The Higley Unified School District inappropriately, if not illegally, used a veteran political pollster to conduct a telephone survey of residents about a proposed budget override — after the school board already had committed to placing the measure before voters in the Nov. 4 general election.
Now, the district wants to compound that error by reneging on its contract to pay the pollster $10,500 for work already preformed.
…
District officials say they didn’t violate that law because the board approved a contract with pollster Bruce Merrill to conduct the survey on June 26, a week before the board decided to call the budget override election. If that interpretation is wrong, district spokeswoman Sara Bresnahan told Ringle the district will try to avoid any sanctions by refusing to pay Merrill.
What a mess.
This appears to be another in a long line of fumbles and gaffes by the HUSD administration. I’d say it really is time to start looking at changes in the leadership of the district.
Leave a comment